Free Macro Depth of Field Calculator
At macro distances the normal DoF formulas break down โ magnification takes over. This calculator uses the magnification-based approximation, reports your effective aperture, and gives you the exact focus-stacking step size.
Your setup
Result
Why macro DoF is different
At 1:1 magnification, depth of field is roughly DoF โ 2ยทNยทcยท(m+1)/mยฒ โ it scales with the square of magnification, which is why 2:1 has about a quarter of the DoF of 1:1 at the same f-stop. Two practical consequences:
- Stopping down barely helps. f/16 at 1:1 gives ~1.9 mm of DoF on full frame โ and diffraction (plus effective-aperture light loss) is already visible.
- Effective aperture widens. At 1:1 the effective aperture is 2 stops slower than set: f/8 set = f/16 effective. Your meter and exposure need the compensation, which is why macro images look underexposed at high magnification.
Related tools & guides
Depth of Field Calculator
The standard near/far calculator for non-macro work.
Open โDepth of Field for Macro
Stacking workflow, lighting, and lens choices.
Read โExposure Equivalence
Recompute exposure when effective aperture kicks in.
Open โMacro DoF FAQ
Why is my sharp area so thin even at f/16?
Because DoF falls with the square of magnification. At 2:1, f/16 gives under 1 mm. Diffraction also erodes sharpness beyond ~f/11 effective โ which is exactly why macro photographers focus-stack instead of stopping down.
What does effective aperture mean for exposure?
The effective aperture is N ร (1 + m). At 1:1 it's two stops narrower than set, so your camera's through-the-lens metering compensates automatically โ but manual flash calculations must add those stops or your macro shots come out dark.
How do I choose a stacking step size?
Move focus by roughly 80% of the DoF per frame (the calculator's step uses this with safety overlap). Too big โ gaps that even software can't stitch; too small โ hundreds of redundant frames.